News and views from the President/CEO


CEO Connects with Staff

 

Budget blues - again


Colleagues

I hope you've all had a relaxing and refreshing Summer break.  As you'll know, we've got challenging times ahead of us.

Since my last blog I've continued my "Travel Alberta" program, most recently to Lethbridge and on to Pincher Creek to look at a really good model of service integration in a rural setting.  On Tuesday, I gave a speech at the Calgary Rotary Club called Life in a Cold Climate: Managing Canada's Biggest Merger, about our directions and some of the challenges facing us.  A copy of this speech is available here.

The Budget

We continue to work on the budget.   In my second blog post back in April, I talked about the "budget blues."  I mentioned that "we had quite a big task ahead of us," and so this proved.  Although we got a 6% or so increase in funding, this is not enough to meet our current spend.  The Board at its June meeting approved a budget for Alberta Health Services in 2009-2010 which was framed as involving $250M of budget savings, growing on an annualized basis to $650M.  This budget meant we would have to borrow significantly to balance in 2009-10 and would leave a gap of somewhere between $500M and $700M in 2010-11, assuming that we would achieve a funding  increase of 5.8% in 2010-11 and be fully funded for the opening of the new facilities which come on stream in that year.  A big task indeed! 

Over the last few months the Executive and senior staff have been working on identifying ways in which we can save that money.  Steps to rein in expenditures include our vacancy management program, which has tightened up on external recruitment.  My goal in all of this is to minimize potential layoffs.  We have made significant progress on identifying areas of savings, and one of the most outstanding has been the work done in procurement.   Here we look to make around $200M of savings in a full year, and we are on track to achieve that.  Those sorts of savings can only be achieved as a result of the work done, not only by the procurement folks, but by people throughout the organization who are thinking about how to standardize the products we purchase, and improve distribution of products.  We might even be able to increase our saving estimates through our collaborative work with British Columbia.  There are further savings to be achieved in back office functions.  We are looking to rationalize our multiple payroll systems, multiple HR systems, multiple IT systems and so on to achieve further savings. 

But we are aiming not only to minimize layoffs but also to ensure that service delivery is protected.  One of the examples I have talked about in the past few weeks is how we could achieve savings and improve quality at the same time, specifically mentioning patients occupying acute beds who don't need to be there - the so-called "alternate level of care" patients. If you think about it, once an acute care episode is finished, a hospital bed is a silly place for a person to be. The environment is noisy, not the least bit home-like and so on.  It is far better for that person to be in a more home-like environment, quieter, in more comfortable surroundings, than to occupy an acute bed.  It also helps us with our sustainability goal.  We staff a hospital bed for people with acute needs, the nursing staff are trained and oriented to look after people in acute need.  People in residential care have different health needs and different expectations (and rights) about maintaining their own independence.  So part of what we need to do is to open additional residential care beds, so that we can move those alternate level of care patients out of the acute facilities, thus achieving a saving and a quality improvement at the same time.   That sort of an approach is going to be a cornerstone of our budget strategies and we are now looking at these sorts of strategies across the province.  These strategies need to be carefully phased so that to take account of when residential care facilities become available. More on this soon.

This approach is also central to our thinking about Alberta Hospital Edmonton.  When I visited there earlier this year staff talked about "ALC patients" and after asking a few questions I realized there were the same issues at Alberta Hospital Edmonton as in our other acute facilities: people who are occupying acute beds with nowhere more appropriate to go.  Again, any downsizing at AHE has to be accompanied by appropriate accommodation or services being established in the community. Our commitment to our patients is clear: No hospital spaces will be closed unless and until community-based beds and services are in place.  We are currently consulting with staff at Alberta Hospital Edmonton on what appropriate services might look like.  Unfortunately the to-and-fro you see in the media on this issue is the result of our desire to consult on what is appropriate care for the people who might be moved, so we can't be more definitive about what the next steps might be.  I'd invite those who question the decision not to redevelop Alberta Hospital Edmonton to remember that if the hospital were to continue in its current form - a care model out of touch with contemporary best practice - there would be a need for a massive redevelopment.  Such a redevelopment is not currently on the approved and funded capital program and it seemed to me to be dishonest to keep pretending that such a development would happen.  I recognize that there are concerns about whether or not the community spaces will be created. To that I say: Watch us.

These sorts of strategies are in fact not enough to achieve our budget goals, so we need everybody in Alberta Health Services to put on their thinking caps to identify different ways of achieving savings.  I will be shortly writing to senior staff in the organization seeking ideas where they can develop saving strategies specific to their local organizations, zones or hospital facilities.  A number of you in your blog comments have pointed out areas of inefficiency across the organization, including comments from people who are not working to their full scope of practice. So as we issue budgets to zones and facilities we will be setting targets for further saving strategies.

But in preparing our budget strategies we must always have in mind the Strategic Directions of the organization.  We have set ourselves ambitious targets about improving Access, Quality and Sustainability.  So any saving strategies must not impact on the access and quality goals of the organization as we have articulated them in the Strategic Directions.  We have committed to improving access and quality and so I'll be looking to saving strategies and other organizational arrangements which help us achieve those ambitious targets.

Albertans have a reputation for innovation and a "can do" attitude.  It is my hope that we can harness this energy, this innovation to come up with bright ideas which we can use to achieve our budget targets and improve service for Albertans.  I have asked the three "hospital" Senior Vice-Presidents and the Zone Vice-Presidents to schedule regular discussions about different ideas that are coming forward so that there can be sharing across the organization.  That is how we can use the benefit of a single provincial organization to make sure there is learning across the province and that the bright ideas of one part of the province are able to be implemented in another. 

I am confident that with this sort of initiative we'll be able to demonstrate leadership across Canada in innovation in service delivery.

With best wishes,

Stephen

 
 
 
 
Comments:

It is terrific that some savings are being realized. My concern is with the closing of AHE. I work in mental health and from my experience, there are people whose instability is very difficult to address in the community. We lack supportive housing alternatives that would provide enough structure for the client to remain indpendent in the community, with dignity and respect. It takes time to develop housing initiatives so to properly accomodate clients from AHE, it might be months or longer to have everything in place. I hope that the funding will precede the clients into the community so that the supports are available when the clients leave the hospital. Serving clients in the community is great when there is funding to do it properly but that has not always been the case in Alberta.

Posted by Randy Harris on August 26, 2009 at 08:18 AM MDT #

Hi Dr. Duckett. At what point do people simply accept that good health care is expensive? That isn't an excuse to be wasteful but the fact of the matter is that costs for everything have skyrocketed over the past few years and life in general is simply more expensive. Add the fact that Alberta has been vigourously trying to catch up on staffing problems and infrastructure and it's no wonder that per capita health spending is through the roof. You correctly identified that acute beds are being clogged up by people with nowhere to go and once again, developing and staffing more appropriate placements is going to be expensive. I am confused as to how the current cost containment model is going to address that.

Posted by Paul on August 26, 2009 at 08:28 AM MDT #

Thanks for your comments. Randy: As I said in the blog, no place will be closed until there is somewhere for the person to go. You're right, this will mean an upfront investment. Paul: You too have hit the nail on the head. We've got to open more spaces in the community if we are to deal with the ALC issues in acute. That is what we are planning to do. But we also need to find the money to do that - and we're still working on our strategies about how to do that! Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on August 26, 2009 at 10:42 AM MDT #

After reading your comments in the Edmonton Journal today I have to ask - do you know what a nurse does? at the bedside? in emergency? in an out patient clinic? Not only do we do discharge teaching, arrange for home care and prescriptions but we also comfort the sad and fearful, change dressings, teach dressing changes, start I.V.'s, prepare patients for surgery & tests, administer medications including chemotherapy, sit with a dying patient, teach baby care to a new mom, hold a child during a procedure, check vital signs on patients (sometimes hourly, admit patients to the ward.... I could go on. I can't imagine re-organizing any sytem without in depth knowledge of the breadth of roles of each key player.

Posted by Lorie Grundy on August 26, 2009 at 11:02 AM MDT #

Lorie: Short hand comments probably don't convey everything I had in mind. But let's think of another question. What proportion of an RN's day should be spent on doing things that only an RN can do (i.e. an LPN or Health Care Aide couldn't do)? 30%? 50%? 70%? 90%? 100%? (Yes I understand that RN's don't only do tasks). Perhaps a better way of thinking about this is to say that, in a hospital (or in the communit), you need a team of people do do everything that needs to be done. What is the appropriate composition of that team? Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on August 26, 2009 at 12:00 PM MDT #

Dr. Duckett, I agree that there are many tasks that LPN's can do that RN's can do, but it's the quality, empathy, and compassion that the task is completed with that makes the difference. As a pharmacist, I notice major differences in the quality of work completed between RN's and LPN's. For instance, when an LPN reconciles medication upon hospital admission there, generally speaking, are many more errors, omission and admission alike, which contributes to patient morbidity and increased health care costs. I don't know if it's inherently better clinical intuition or just a byproduct of higher education, but RN's provide a much better, dollar for dollar, level of care than LPNs. An investment in more LPN's at the cost of RN's will end up costing the health care system due to decreased quality of care.

Posted by Mike Laevens on August 26, 2009 at 01:58 PM MDT #

I am responding to your comment posted by Lori Grundy and my first question to you would be "if your loved one was in a serious accident or required life saving measures who would you want looking after them?" Would you want someone who has limited amount of skills or knowledge? Will you get the same compassion and caring? The complexity of health care today has created a need for more experienced health care professionals. Replacing that with inexperience is not the answer. I am amazed every day I go to work with how much knowledge is required in my field of practice and how uncomfortable I am when I am unfamiliar with things. How often do we hear about medical errors in the media and the unfortunate outcomes. Do we not learn from these experiences how important education, learning and experience are and how it is these measures that will prevent future errors. My fear is that the direction of health care today will lead to more costs not savings. When you practice health promotion and prevention you keep people out of the system. Who better to do that than a qualified health care professional. CP

Posted by carol on August 26, 2009 at 02:19 PM MDT #

Dr. Duckett, My suggestions for improving the health status of the Alberta population, and for decreasing health care spending significantly, requires a relatively simple change under the Alberta's Ministry of Transportation - adding demerits to seat belt violations. Motor vehicle injuries accounted for 7,039 emergency department visits, and 974 hospital admissions in Calgary hospitals in 07-08. Collisions were responsible for over a third of all major trauma treated at the Foothills Medical Center in 07-08. In addition, Emergency department visits for motor vehicle injuries in 07-08 contributed approximately 30,000 hours of wait time in the region?s emergency departments. With an average hospital stay of 12 days for each motor vehicle injury requiring hospitalization, approx. 12,000 bed days were required. I know not all of these costs would be saved simply with adding demerits to seat belt fines, but research shows that seat belts work, and injuries to unbelted drivers and passengers are far more severe. Approx. 15% of Albertans don't buckle up. In focus groups, these unbelted Albertans say they will only change their behaviour if the penalty affects their ability to get insurance, or to drive, which demerits do. As a province, we need to (continue to) partner with other government departments to decrease the burden of injury. Adding demerits is a "quick win". I suggest that Minister Liepert could have a discussion with Minister Luke Ouellette to save the coffers of AHS, and the whole province, money with the stroke of a pen.

Posted by Carol Beringer on August 26, 2009 at 02:20 PM MDT #

Hi Stephen- I can see that there is a tremendous challenge ahead of us, and I agree that deficit spending is not the way to correct the situation. My concern is that the current "big picture" focus of medicine itself is the core of our current problems. Until and unless prevention and wellness are culturally entrenched, we will not be able to change what services we currently offer- our patients will demand it of us, because that is what they have been taught to expect. Until we reach out to the communities and schools and ensure that our entire society is cared for, and cares for itself at the most basic levels we will not have a significant impact on the current model of medical care. I fear that these short term budget blues will completely eliminate any chance for these cultural changes to occur.

Posted by Connie Kadey on August 26, 2009 at 02:29 PM MDT #

Thank you for this forum. Please ask the Minister of Health to bring back Health premiums so that funding can increase by what is collected. I understand providing relief to the fixed-income citizens but the total elimination of health premiums has put pressure on an already stressed system then he added the expectation to amalgamate, evolve, and realize savings which will cost funds the system didn't have when premiums were paid. If paying paying Health premiums will ensure accessible and sustainable Health care, I don't think any Albertan will complain.

Posted by Athena Born on August 26, 2009 at 02:31 PM MDT #

My question is that during a time when health dollars are tight why would we consider even cutting health care premiums. Other provinces get their revenue for health care through provincial taxes. As long as I have been here even during the times of prosperity we paid health care premiums. Why is it now during a recession when dollars are tight and we are in great dept would we cut health care premiums. Why not consider reintroducing them. During a time when health care has become so advanced and complex why would we even consider replacing qualified health care professionals with less qualified staff. CP

Posted by Carol Perry on August 26, 2009 at 02:41 PM MDT #

I do agree that the current state of healthcare system in Alberta cannot be sustained without creating greater efficiencies at all levels and within all programs under this umbrella. Healthcare has struggled with being seen as a business and as a result accountablility to the bottom line has been lacking. Lack of absence management is an area where millions of dollars are being lost each year. Costs such as those expended on programs such as the "N95 respirator" fit testing program is cost effective only if based on risk management. Healthcare's greater risk and costs come from employees sustaining musculo-skeletal injuries; a cost realized each and everyday. Looking at all areas where savings can be realized includes those where increasing the human resources and expertise could have a positive effect on the bottom line.

Posted by Deb Taylor on August 26, 2009 at 02:49 PM MDT #

Perhaps then the same question should then be asked of physicians. What proportion of a physicians day should be spent doing things only a physician can do? (ie a nurse practitioner, certified midwife, physicians assistant, emergency medical technician)

Posted by Lorie Grundy on August 26, 2009 at 03:08 PM MDT #

The question needs to be, "how do we keep people healthy" so that the need for acute care services, rehab, etc. is drastically reduced? Most of the dialogue I see is around "patient-care" and "clinical services"; nothing about health promotion (includig the determinants of health), disease and injury prevention. I hope AHS doesn't lose sight of those areas in all the changes. With only approximately 2% of the budget going into Public Health and even less into Health Promotion, I don't know how we can begin to see a significant improvement in the health of the population. Now with looming budget cuts where "soft services" seem to get cut first, I worry about where that's going to leave Public Health and Health Promotion.

Posted by Gayle Thoun on August 26, 2009 at 03:13 PM MDT #

Our rural hospital has "transition" beds which allow those patients who are no longer acute to move into those beds to continue to get the rehabilitation services for a period of time before going home. I believe that this is an effective way to help reduce costs. However, ownership over those beds is tightly guarded and no other acute facility by can access those beds for their patients. Perhaps more of these type of beds can be created? Or perhaps there needs to be direction from upper management that no one owns those beds...as we are all now one entity. Just a few thoughts...

Posted by Tammy on August 26, 2009 at 03:48 PM MDT #

I am having problems understanding some of the decisions that have been made thus far in the Organization of the new AHS. I am confused firstly about a decison that has been made around the Support group of workers. How is it cost saving to cut workers or time from these people. This group are the least paid and are some of the most important workers in the system when it comes to patient care. > Dietary Department > facilities need to have adequate staff to feed both patients and staff. Making sure that patients are fed well balanced diets and the correct diet go a long way to people getting better and thus freeing up beds. > Environmentaly Services staff are very important if we are going to keep facilities clean, therefore keeping infection under control and the spread of disease to a minimum. I have yet to see that we are following the right people doing the right jobs. Nursing staff are still doing housekeeping duties due to the lack of adequate Enviromental service shifts for evenings in many hospitals also the most resent cut back of only partially covering shifts when environmental services staff are away, again this causes other departments to have to do duties that normally are not in their job description?? How does this save dollars? How does this promote patient safety? >Security has been restructured to the point that we have bare bones for security? How does this promote patient safety? Staff safety? Meet standards? >Maintenance departments can't do half of what they originally could do thus the facilities are falling apart. Cost saving? Maintenance can no longer have evening shifts but it is more efficient to pay call backs? Cost saving? Patient security? Example 1 2009 AHS - Nursing has been restructured so that they have a Supervisor Acute Care nursing> a site Manager> a district Manager > 2 Directors Standards & Planning>Executive Director > VP Community & Rural > EVP Rural & Community> President and Chief Executive Officer>AHS> Minister of Health> Preimer of AB. (not to mention all the budget managers etc that nursing is associated with like Surgical, Obstetrical, Emergency Medicine....and so on) 1995- Regionalization - Nsg Clinical Manager> Site Leader> VP of Nursing> CEO 1994 & Prior to Regionalizaton - Nursing Leader> Administrator>Alberta Hospital Board Example 2 2009 AHS Health Information Management > Site Supervisor>Zone Supervisor>Director > VP>EVP>President & Chief Executive>AHS>Miniter of Health> Preimer AB (Plus many parts of HIS have been divided out to a Provincial level - Standards- Operations - Strategic Initiatives Regionalization 1995 Health Information Services > Site Supervisor> Rural Manager, Operational Manager of systems, Operational Manager of Policy & Procedure > Director > Assistant VP Knowledge Management> VP > CEO>AB Hrealth & Wellness> Minister of Health> Premier of AB 1994 - Site Supervisor> Administrator > AB Hospital Board > Minister of Health> Preimier of AB I know that the last scenario in each of these seems small but it was like this for each hospital thererore when looking at the big picture there are more numbers. It would be interesting to note if all the management in those days - 1 administrator X how many hospitals = how many managers we have in the system today.??? As a worker I was really hoping to have the lines of communication shortened and I am confused as to why it would not be better for each Health Record Department to get their info directly from Standards, Operations, Strategic planning rather than having the information for my area alone go through 5 people in each of the areas listed = 12, (e.g. ex director>director provincial standards >Mnaager E_HIM>manager Legal Halth Record > Zone Director> rural Manager> Suprevisor) before it gets to the departments who are actually directly envolved with the work being done? I am sure for some of the reorganizing there is good explanation and we probably could not operate like we did in 1994 but the structure still needs to be simplified, and dollars will be saved? Maybe when job descriptions are all done and submitted one will be able to see any duplication. I really hope that we do not have to see reduction in actual workers because we are all ready working with minimal staff and I don't know how a system can cut staff when the population that this staff is servicing is growing faster than we are hiring, this in itself poses many patient saftety issues, burnt out staff, in experienced staff left in charge, crumbing facilities housing more patient's than it should, waiting times going up and the list goes on. Regarding the the voluntary early retiremnet program.....I am confused as to how this will work? If a system that is already short staffed had many staff taking voluntary retirements where does that leave the system, less staff, less experience? Is this program targeted solely at the working people not management? If so what is the savings going to be? The wages of the workers is a small amount compared to the Management, Director. VP, wages in the AHS structure. It is the same old question why do we tend to cut back on the lower less paid positions that do the actual hands on work and keep levels of workers that are in higher paid management type positions. Like I outlined earlier the reporting lines need to be shortened and the current structure now in place has made the reporting lines running in many directions and how cost saving and efficient is this going to be? Yours truly, A concerned, patient, tax payer, health worker.

Posted by Colleen on August 26, 2009 at 04:36 PM MDT #

I work as a social worker in Alberta Hospital,on the in-patient unit that cares for individuals with developmental disabilities. In the community, this population is funded by Persons With Developmental Disabilities (PDD). PDD and the agencies they fund successfully support most of the individuals with this disability in Alberta. Unfortunately, these community services have a much more difficult time supporting disabled folks with complex behavioural concerns. As a result, the community has relied upon hospital in-patient units such as ours, when these complex individuals can no longer be managed safely. The original purpose of our unit was to stabilize and return the person to the community within 120 days. However, we are no longer able to conform to the mandate of our unit, because these people are beyond the capacity of community services to be safely cared for. In addition, PDD has no more funds to support new clients. All 14 of our beds are now occupied with patients that have been in Alberta Hospital for many months/years and we can no longer admit individuals who are in crisis in the community. How will plans for AHS restructuring address the PDD budget deficit? How will these plans address the reality that PDD agencies are consistently declining to care for our complex patients? What plans are in place to increase these agencies ability to successfully care for these clients? Can you provide any specific assurances to the families/guardians of these patients?

Posted by Rob Scott on August 26, 2009 at 04:53 PM MDT #

Mr. Duckett, I also appreciate that we have this forum to ask questions and express our opinion, without fear of violating the recent 'Code of Ethics' that was handed down. I have a few comments about the information that has come out today in regards to the budget and our anticipated shortfall. It is mentioned that early retirement packages will be offered to staff in the near future. However, in your speech in Calgary, you indicated that one of the greatest challenges will be the burgeoning population and the need for health care providers to look after this population. It would appear that these two issues are at opposition with each other. How do you anticipate meeting the need for providers when you have encouraged them all to leave?? My other concern is the closure of the beds at AHE. I currently manage a unit that deals with a challenging geriatric population with extreme behaviours. We frequently admit residents to my unit who were at AHE for stabilization and are now able to be reintegrated into conventional LTC beds, but, we also frequently have residents whose care needs are too difficult for my staff to manage and we rely heavily on the ability of AHE to accept these residents in a timely fashion, before they hurt either themselves; other co-residents or staff. At times, we have to keep these folks here, as there is a significant wait list for the beds at AHE. If acute beds close there, will it be at the expense of my unit when there is nowhere to send these people? Speaking from the community perspective, of which I am also familiar, the availability of skilled staff to deal with the needs of this population is very limited. Many community settings will not accept anyone right now who exhibits less than normal and socially acceptable behaviours. I suspect that there will be a lot of work and money required to bring those homes and their staff to the point where they are comfortable with the needs of this group. As much as I would like to believe that this can occur in the next year or two, the more skeptical side of me believes that there is a significant cultural shift that will need to occur for this to be successful. As negative as my comments may be, I do agree that changes need to occur. I just hope that we are able to do them without causing further issues that negatively impact the patients we are supposed to be looking after.

Posted by Yvette on August 26, 2009 at 05:00 PM MDT #

Hopefully quality,empathy and compassion in the completion of tasks are not relegated as the domain of any one group. The team approach can have much to offer. Our department used to consist of only technologists. For a number of reasons, we now have an interdisciplinary team. While some tasks are independent within each discipline due to restricted practice, as a team, we are becoming increasingly familiar with each others roles. This makes us interchangeable in areas allowed by our respective scopes of practice. Team members engage and learn from each other. We are all getting the benefit of the other team members skills! The combined skills of the team can do so much more than any one member could. We tried to break down department needs to hire the right mix of staff. We now have technical assistants, nurses, techs, clerks, doctors and students. Working as a team improves quality..it doesn't weaken it. If it does, you don't have a team. There is less crisis management because it is flexible. Because it is flexible there is less relief required. Because there is less relief, I believe it is cost efficient. The team mix is also cost efficient. Because it is cost efficient, we can do more, allowing for a coordination of services. Because services are coordinated, better patient care, quality and access results. Only my opinion.

Posted by vera krause on August 26, 2009 at 08:57 PM MDT #

It is always interesting to read this blog, although I think that there is a lot of editing going on in the comments posted. I agree with many of the posts and share many of the concerns about budget. And regardless of org charts and commuinques, I still have questions about where this organization is actually going? Many of the recent announcements related to 'budget blues' fly in the face of the strategic direction of AHS, the AHW business plan (which AHS managed to covet as it's strategy) and current GOA initiatives. For example, Safe Com calls for additional beds for addiction and mental health, not fewer, and there is money attached to this initiative. Furthermore, many of the former AHS entities (and their very professional and dedicated staff) came into this 'merger' without debt and often with provincial, national and international recognition for excellence. It is demoralizing to see that these entities and their staff are now lumped into an organization that cannot boast anything similar. All for what? Any plans for changing the current system, especially with the transition from former entities to AHS and the integration of AADAC and mental health services seemingly have no support and no leadership. There is no time given to realize benefits for Albertans or to evaluate this 'merger'. Suggesting the media is playing up current issues in a negative light is not altogether true, since media and the public have access to this forum among others. And they also have access to information that AHS staff seem to be shielded from until released by means other than internal communication. How does this reflect the value of transparency?

Posted by dlj on August 26, 2009 at 11:09 PM MDT #

Hi. One non- staffing way to save money would be to make staff aware about how much supplies cost(like maybe madatorily post the cost of products in all hospital supply rooms where staff can see it)- one of my previous employers apparently once did that years ago... and it saved them heaps in supplies as the staff became less wasteful. Another idea is to reduce paper consumption on the units- I work on an inpatient unit that is supposed to be "paperless"-well- we use more paper than ever before!(Each order entered on any patient in the former CHR inpatient units- all sites- causes 1 pg. per order to be printed out- meaning pages and pages for pts every day-)To figure out "Why?" I had written letters to our computer-tech personnel about this. The reason that they still print out is because of the issue of the correct order being tracked during "down- time"- (where during "down time" the back up server does not get backed up until a three hour period). So theoretically these orders can be tracked based on these print outs. But what actually happens is that these papers get lost in a paper mess- there is far too much paper trail for this system to work on a busy medical unit. So the solution there would be to make the "downtime" server(the goal I think is a 1 hour back up time) a priority - and save heaps in supply cost, paper management-unit clerks, etc, and distribution, and waste management- you would easily cut a units paper in half with that change.

Posted by Nicole on August 27, 2009 at 01:26 AM MDT #

To respond to Mike L's comments, the last time I checked empathy and compassion are NOT taught to RNs, rather they are characteristics that some people; RNs or LPNs hold. I would like to know who deems that RNs are of a higher quality of nurse. I've been a LPN for 6 years and when RNs graduate who do they come to with questions? The experienced NURSES! Why? Because when it comes to nursing we are all a team and experience is was makes a great nurse. Critical thinking is not something that can be taught but rather something that a nurse either has or doesn't. There are many LPNs on the floors who hold the ability to critically think, and many RNs who do NOT! Don't compare LPNs and RNs for we are a team and if the Pharmacy Department has an issue with the way that some nurses are reconciling medications you should take it up with the specific nurses who are not completing these forms properly.

Posted by Jodi Breitkreuz on August 27, 2009 at 03:29 AM MDT #

Dr. Duckett, I was wondering why my blog comment never made it to your site. I do believe I followed the blog policy. I do however have an idea how you can ease the burden of clients waiting for long term beds and taking up valuable acute care beds in all the other existing hospitals. Just change the focus of the new South Calgary Hospital to accomodate this population. It would be a perfect fit.It is at the stage that the changes necessary to make it a state of the arts long term facility are still possible. It could be staffed with the right mix of RN's, LPN's and Nursing attendants, house all the support services necessary to give our Seniors the best care possible. It would free up loads of beds in the existing hospitals for acutely ill clients and we could continue using the services in these hospitals instead of building new ones. This should ease some of the "Budget Blues". Thank you for listening.

Posted by Veronika Kierzek on August 27, 2009 at 05:44 AM MDT #

Lots of comments, thanks. Some, of course, are suggestions beyond AHS' mandate but perhaps we should take up e.g. Carol's. Certainly tightening up on penalties for drink driving influences behaviour. Lorie: I agree with you about the additional question. Almost every time I visit an Emergency department (as I call them), I ask whether they employ nurse practitioners. Gayle: I've made it clear that any budget reductions will not impact on our Strategic Directions, including the commitments we made about public health/health promotion. Colleen: despite what looks like lots of levels, I checked some of those before I signed off on them to make sure we weren't adding management roles (in fact in one case you highlight we changed the proposal to make sure we weren't). We have already significantly reduced the number of management positions in AHS. In terms of some of the support areas you mention, each of tehse had a business case (some quite detailed), which showed teh savings that could be made. In some cases (such as security) we were bringing one part of province (e.g. Calgary or Edmonton) into line with what worke elsewhere. Rob and Yvette: I am aware of the PDD issue and understand we are taking that into account in our planning. I made a commitment in the blog about services in advance of moves of patients which I will stick to. Unfortunately, no time to respond to other posts today as I have to go to Beaverlodge. I'll try either later today or tomorrow. Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on August 27, 2009 at 06:32 AM MDT #

I think it is incredible all the people who think that bringing back health premiums are going to help AHS. AHS paid premiums for all of its workers. Now that there is no premium AHS now has a windfall of cash that use to be designated to pay for employee's premiums. AHS is not going to get any more or less mone from the government if the premiums are re-introduced. If anything, bringing back permiums will help the govenment and cost AHS.

Posted by Todd Baxter on August 27, 2009 at 08:21 AM MDT #

Hello Dr. Duckett, I also seem to be one of the people whose blog posts aren?t posted. I hope this doesn't mean they aren't being read. One idea I've had increases the budget available to AHS, improves access to primary care, reduces the reliance on physicians, provides better working conditions for physicians and ultimately may lead to reduced reliance on acute care facilities. Sounds like a silver bullet eh? My suggestion is for AHS to open and operate primary care clinics, to be staffed by fee for service physicians and salaried members of the interprofessional health team (NPs, BHCs, etc). The funding model mirrors how physicians (most notably radiologists) organize themselves in the "private" sector here in Alberta. Specifically, billing physicians keep a percentage (70%-80%) of their billing fees for the services they provide and the clinic (owned by a group of physicians) keep the remaining percentage to operate the clinic (hire support staff, pay rent, buy equipment, etc, etc.). Essentially, physicians pay for someone else to "run" the business side of their practice, allowing them to focus on doctoring. As the clinic proprietor, AHS could add the 20%-30% to its budget (I?m assuming AHS wouldn?t need the full 20%-30% to run the clinics) in addition to creating a tangible bridge between acute and community care. This plan does not "create" any new money, but it does enable a substitution of physician fee for service money to the AHS budget, without involving Health & Wellness. In times of reducing global budgets I believe that we can benefit from substitutions as much as from cuts. Thank you for you time. Kevin

Posted by Kevin Gerrits on August 27, 2009 at 09:43 AM MDT #

Regarding my previous comment, it was not intended to be malicious nor take away from the tremendous job that LPN's do. I apologize if it anyone has taken offended. I realize the RN's and LPN's work as a team not against each other. I was wrong in saying someone's job title defines their character or ability to care for a patient because it doesn't. I just don't wish to see more RN's taken out of the equation.

Posted by Mike Laevens on August 27, 2009 at 09:44 AM MDT #

Dr. Duckett, It seems to me a slippery slope. If our leaders are to begin attrition of RNs and replacing their critical role with LPNs what is to stop the attrition of experienced medical doctors with less experienced doctors or even worse a change in the education of physicians all together to allow for lower paid, less educated "basic medical practitioners" all in the name of "cost effectiveness." Are you truly here to make our medical system better? Or are you really here to cut costs no matter the expense to the health care in our province?

Posted by Jocelyn Naron on August 27, 2009 at 01:03 PM MDT #

Hi. Back from Beaverlodge and Grande Prairie so I can continue responding. Darlene (aka dlj): You're right, budget integrity was quite variable across the province under the previous regimes. All I can say is that we will meet our budget targets and this applies to all budget units regardless of their provenance. Nicoel: Both good suggestions and I'll pass them on. Veronika: I don't recall seeing a previous post from you. Basically I upload anything with an albertahealthservices.ca address (or like). No censorship based on whether I do or don't like what you say (with arre exceptions which usually involve an email from me). Anyway, in terms of your idea. We're building the South health campus as an acute hospital not really set up with the sorts of rooms, cooking facilities and the like to be suitable for independent living. what we need to do though, is as you suggest, make sure we've got suitable accommodation available in the community. Kevin: yep, I read them all, posted or not. I'm with you in terms of importance of expanding primary care. Jocelyn: I don't think we are on a slippery slope. What we need to ensure is all our changes are consistemnt with our three goals of access, quality and sustainability. Donna: I guess all I can say is we need to work together so that the budget reductions fall in a way which ensures we protect (and indeed, enhance) access. Jo: You're right. It is designed to be an internal blog and my comments are directed to staff and I only upload comments from staff. However, I am aware that the blod is accessible externally. Best wishes to everyone Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on August 27, 2009 at 06:10 PM MDT #

Mike, thank you for clarifying your earlier comment. The thing to remember is that health care needs NURSES. If people think that LPNs are excited about the idea of one day filling an RN's shoes they're wrong. Those are big shoes to fill. But together along with the nursing aides and other departments we are a great team with the common goal of taking care of people in every stage of healthcare.

Posted by Jodi Breitkreuz on August 28, 2009 at 12:51 AM MDT #

Jodi: Thanks for participating in the interchange again. I agree we need NURSES and particularly your comments about the team. Lest you think I'm playing with the term nurse, I'm not. To be explicit RNs will always have a critical role in the health care team, I expect RNs will continue to provide leadership to the rest of the nursing team on the wards and so on. Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on August 28, 2009 at 05:42 AM MDT #

Dr. Duckett. I have a suggestion ot two that I believe would be one solution to saveing the alberta Goventment millions of $$$ each year. The last time that this re-structuring and cutbacks hit the province many of us headed to the US as there was no work here. While there I was trained as a PICC nurse. This involved the insertion of PICC lines, removal of PICC lines and the repair and de-clotting of the PICC line. It also involved reading teh placement x-Ray to ensure that the line was in the correct position. The cost to have a RN insert a PICC line at the bedside is approximately $300.00 versus that approximately $3,000.00 to have a physician insert this line. HUGE savings for the province. Also to place NPs or PAs in the emergency room to run the fast track area is another huge saving. This is looking at the sort of things that you noted earlier about nurses doing things that they can do and not performing tasks that others could do. Just a thought to save some $$$

Posted by Hugh on August 28, 2009 at 06:54 AM MDT #

Hugh: Both good ideas Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on August 28, 2009 at 07:36 AM MDT #

Sir: As I read the latest budget news, I fear that we are going to retrace the steps of the mid-1990s, when beds were closed, jobs were cut, wages were slashed and a Calgary hospital was blown up. There are a number of issues with this approach. Firstly, it is an oft-repeated fallacy that health care costs are increasing. When population growth and GDP are taken into account, spending is increasing at a very modest level (source: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation, Dec 2007; http://www.chsrf.ca/mythbusters/html/myth28_e.php). Secondly, health care costs cannot be reduced by limiting supply of services; this has been tried repeatedly across the country and all it leads to is pent-up demand, lengthening waitlists, increasing emergency room usage, and political pressure for stopgap solutions that increase costs even more. Instead we need to look at approaches that reduce demand: increasing our commitment to wellness and health promotion, illness and injury prevention, improved chronic disease management, and improving the efficacy (as opposed to efficiency) of our hospitals. Squeezing staffing levels will also backfire, in increased overtime costs, increased absenteeism and higher turnover. Instead, staffing must be augmented, both with professional providers and support staff (to give the professionals more time to exercise their expertise). Again, we need to look not at limiting supply but reducing demand. In the acute-care setting, a nursing staff mix richer in Registered Nurses has been shown in a number of studies to reduce complications that contribute to increased lengths of stay (Tourangeau, et al, 2002). Modest levels of "overstaffing" greatly increases surge capacity and ability to manage unpredictable workloads, reducing overtime costs (CNAC, 2002). Allied health professionals whose care has an impact on lengths of stay (for example, physiotherapists) must be put on 7-day-a-week schedules. Of course, these and other similar measures cost more up front, but eventually pay off. Workplace cultures must also be changed to support nurses' independent decision making in matters of client care; micro-management and "control freak" leadership styles are not acceptable. Information technology (IT) is increasingly important, but very expensive. Ask your IT staff to report on the potential cost savings of implementing one or both of the following strategies: - shift the AHS IT systems out of the expensive Microsoft Windows/Office platform into an open-source ?*nix? environment (saving on software licensing costs) - ditch the current fully-functional workstation network in favour of a "thin-client" architecture (saving on system maintenance labour costs and workstation hardware upgrades) Much has been said about the number of so-called "clipboard carriers" in the system today, with the thought that those positions could be declared expendable in favour of direct care providers. However, changing expectations makes many of those positions indispensable. For example, patient safety and related concerns make data collection and analysis more demanding and labour intensive than it once was. Discharge planners, patient navigators and case managers are there to assist patients with multiple health problems and their families to access services in an increasingly complex health care system. Increased fiscal accountability and scrutiny mandate more intensive record-keeping and monitoring. The only way to get rid of the "clipboard carriers" would be to compromise these other initiatives. Finally, there is one large group of professionals who practice at arm's length from the system. They are not employees, but instead are most often self-employed small business-persons who are compensated on what is essentially a piecework basis. These professionals (of course, I am referring to physicians) have a great deal of influence in the system, both regarding client care and costs, and larger issues. However, they tend to be very choosy about how engaged they are in the direction of the system, being reluctant to participate in management committees and service teams. Some of this reluctance is understandable, considering that they are not salaried and therefore time not providing care does not earn revenue, even though most still have overhead to pay for (office space, staff, etc.). Physicians are also fiercely independent, and have limited accountability within the health care system. This can often be a barrier to change. Finally, unlike almost all other health care professionals, the distribution of physicians is totally self-directed. Whether it be nurses, sonographers, or physiotherapists, all must consider the relative availability of a job before moving to another community, and employees who go part-time are usually replaced by a new posted vacancy. However, there is nothing to prevent a physician from opening a practice anywhere he or she sees fit, regardless of the needs of the community; nor is there anything to prevent a physician from closing a practice and moving, or reducing their hours to part-time without ensuring that the lost hours are made up by a colleague. This has an adverse impact on the ability of the public to obtain care. Their relationship with the health care system must be strengthened if we are to see real reform.

Posted by Jerry Macdonald on August 28, 2009 at 09:05 AM MDT #

Dr Duckett, While I am sure it is diffcult for you to follow up on every issue raised, it was notable that you did not respond to dlj's comments about the integration of AADAC and mental health services. In fact there seems to have been little or no mention of this in your blogs. As dlj stated, we are still waiting to get any sense of direction or leadership in this merger of services. What we have been left with instead is a climate in which people seem to be managing from a place of fear and where every issue gets passed higher and higher up the chain of command before a decision is made. We are also no closer to achieving the suggested rationale for combining addiction and mental health services which was to ensure that "every door is the right door" for clients. It is no easier for addiction client to access mental health services than it was before. To compound matters there appears to be little support for staff training with people being told that they must take vacation time in order to even attend training that is important for orientation to new posts. Nor is there any indication that cross training is going to be offered to allow staff from both disciplines to offer clients the best possible care.

Posted by RP on August 28, 2009 at 10:06 AM MDT #

I think everyone would likely be in agreement that expanding the scope of certain disciplines is all about ensuring those staff have the competencies necesary. I see no reason why we can't implement policies that staff could use to establish (and maintain) competency and apply them across disciplines, including those not under the HPA. Recently, our site has developed policies for the restricted practice of using sharp instruments in tissue debridement that equally apply to PT, OT, and Nursing. ... . I also think we could improve patient care by having rehab professional available in the Emerg Departments. Both the UK and Australia have made use of "extended scope" or "advanced practice" Physios in the ED to triage and treat patients within their scope of practice with great success. More importantly, the interventions that PTs and OTs could provide in the ED assist in discharge planning and reducing readmissions. Unfortunately, current processes for patients in our ED to access PT/OT don't work. Of patients referred for PT and/or OT while in the ED, over 93% of those patient do not get assessed. The inpatient programs simply don't have the resources to redirect a clinician down to the ED. The inpatient program clinicians simply wait until the patient is admitted to their program (over 90% of patients referred for PT or OT while in the ED ultimately are admitted to the hospital). The result is there is a 3-4 day delay in PT or OT assessing the patient. The presence of PT and OT in the ED would reduce wait times and length of stay for patients both in the ED and admitted to the hospital.

Posted by RAK on August 28, 2009 at 10:11 AM MDT #

Regarding your comments about Alberta Hospital Edmonton, I am a community psychiatric nurse and I am questioning your depiction of AHE as having ?a care model out of touch with contemporary best practice?. Don?t judge a model of care by the old buildings or the lack of resources. AHE staff have unparalleled expertise and AHE programs are based on a truly progressive continuum of care, with assertive community outreach, assertive post-hospital follow-up and in-home assessment, treatment and monitoring, all provided in addition to inpatient care. AHE runs psychiatric day programs and mental health clinics in the community. There is full integration of these programs across the continuum, and within the community at large, including long term care and other hospitals. The model of care includes providing the most appropriate and least restrictive setting for care. The beds at AHE are an integral part of this continuum of care and are in line with contemporary models of best practice, limited only by lack of resources, inadequate upkeep, and under funding, chronic problems in mental health. Yes, there are patients occupying acute beds with nowhere appropriate to go and it is reassuring that they will not be discharged without community based beds in place. But when staff talked about these resources being needed, it was not just because appropriate placements are needed for those currently in hospital; it is because we need those acute beds for people in crisis. There are waiting lists for admission and over capacity protocols. If appropriate beds in the community were available, we could cut down on waiting lists for admission to acute care. It would not preclude the need for acute care. Alberta hospital expertise is very specialized and I am fearful for my clients if the acute inpatient beds are not available when assertive outreach is not enough and urban hospitals are unable to meet their needs. While AHE is not currently on the approved and funded capital program list for redevelopment, it has been the top priority for redevelopment for years and in fact signs were in place saying that redevelopment is underway, which have since been taken down. It was taken off the list and should be put back on the list. It would take significant redevelopment, but the investment would pay off in moving psychiatric care forward in Alberta. Any loss of beds at AHE would leave a very large gap in service that would be very difficult to replace. It is a great disservice to all AHE employees, whether in hospital or in the community, to describe their practice and model of care to be anything less than the current best practice, lack of resources notwithstanding. Sheila

Posted by Sheila on August 28, 2009 at 11:08 AM MDT #

Dr. Duckett: Although an acute care bed may not be the best place for the ALC patient it presently often the only place that has the resources to care for them. In order to have success in moving to the community we ned to be aware of the emeging trends for ALC clients that currently meet barriers in the community because of age, need for bariatric equipment, current facilities that structurally cannot meet the need for the client as well as other barriers to LTC/ALC placemnt in the communitywhich often include behaviors, addictions and MH, lack of staffing , availability of supports( ex staff security)as an example. We need to consider that younger people(adult age group) is requiring ALC. Some of it is due to advances we've seen such as diagnosing dementia's earlier, increasing population in the addictions community etc.

Posted by helen kelly on August 28, 2009 at 12:29 PM MDT #

Dear Dr. Duckett, I am wondering if you have also looked at the cost of care for pressure sores and ulcers. You probably are aware of Austrailian Medical Sheepskin (AMS) and the studies completed on the good results of the product. It is also not funded by the Alberta Government plan AADL and the product is costly for clients. If this product was funded the clients could have the product available at no or low cost for their medical need. The cost for this therapy is NOT costly for the health system when compared to throw away dressings and direct nursing care needed to apply current dressings in the home or facility. AMS has been used successfully in other countries...Austrailia...and the cost of wound management could potentially save millions of dollars in health care delivery. I also would like to mention that the wounds that are created due to lack of training of staff could also be added into this equation. Have a good day, and may you and your family members never have to experience the pain and suffering of a pressure ulcer! Sincerely Dorothy

Posted by Dorothy Jace on August 28, 2009 at 01:20 PM MDT #

Dear Mr Duckett, I have noted, with great interest, your categorical statement that Alberta Hospital Edmonton is "a care model out of touch with contemporary best practice." I would be grateful to receive from you a list of the peer-reviewed literature upon which you formed that opinion. Thank you.

Posted by Peter Rodd on August 28, 2009 at 02:24 PM MDT #

Thanks again for commenting. There are some themes and I will follow up about addictions and mental health issues. I also liked the examples of where we can get efficiencies by changed scope of practice (e.g. physios) or by sheepskins (although my recollection is when we investgated their use in Queensland the evidence wasn't good). In terms of the AHE 'model of care', what I'm really referring to is the idea of the free-standing mental health institution. There are lots of articles about why the western world moved away from this model starting in the 1950s-60s. Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on August 28, 2009 at 03:16 PM MDT #

With respect, the free standing institutions of the 50?s and 60?s were asylums and places to hide away those with mental illness because we were afraid of them and didn?t know what to do with them and AHE care is not the asylum of old. The modern thinking is that we need a continuum of care from prevention, in home and in school assertive outreach, supportive residences, day programs, psychiatric units close to home, satellite beds and teams in rural areas and specialized psychiatric hospitals. We will know that the stigma around mental illness is truly gone when mental health can be proud of a Mental Health Institute, along the lines of the Stollery Children?s hospital, the Manzankowski Heart Institute, or the Cross Cancer institute. AHE works, the setting is conducive to mental health, redevelopment is still indicated now as it has been for years and in the long run, Alberta will likely need more.

Posted by Sheila on August 29, 2009 at 08:40 AM MDT #

Dear Mr Duckett: In your column in yesterday's Edmonton Journal, you state: "Let me be absolutely clear: No hospital spaces will be closed unless and until community-based beds and services are in place. Full stop." However, about 3 weeks ago, the AHS team (including PJ White, Cathy Pryce and Maryanne Stewart) made several presentations at AHE. They emphasized that there were no new monies available, acknowledging that Mental Health would be forced to make a stronger case than other areas of healthcare in order to justify the need for any additional funds. So, if there is no extra money, how is AHS going to pay for the new "community-based beds and services" to which you refer? Also,in your column, you go on to state: ". . . the decision was based on the best medical evidence and advice." This brings me back to my previous request: Please cite your sources! Thank you.

Posted by Peter Rodd on August 30, 2009 at 03:57 PM MDT #

While I certainly can't cite Dr. Duckett's sources, I think perhaps regarding free-standing hospitals -- mental, general, or otherwise -- he may be describing what is sometimes called the Copernican shift in health care thinking. In the past, hospitals have been the sun and all other services -- primary care, day treatment, specialist care -- orbited around them. Current models describe the aggregate of patients as the sun, and hospitals as only one of the planets rotating around them along with the other services described above. I don't think anyone in his right mind would say that we have no use or little use for beds, but I find this model helpful to characterize the shift in health care focus and resource allocation -- they are just another tool in the tool-box. The public is not nearly as enraged when news emerges about pressures and strictures in, say, primary care -- though those pressures are there as much as they are for hospital beds!

Posted by PCH on August 31, 2009 at 07:57 AM MDT #

Dr. Duckett, In line with your principle for AHS to be transparent, how come you are effectively telling the media that our partners and suppliers will have a 3% cutback effective Dec 1, 2009? How come you don?t share that these agencies and partners have had a 6% increase this year prior to this 3% cutback? This would have our partners having a NET INCREASE of 3% occurring for this fiscal year. How is giving out a 3% increase a strategy to reduce the deficit? It seems like in your media announcement, released on August 26th, that you weren?t being respectful or transparent to any of your employees. Sincerely, Patricia

Posted by Patricia Stoutenberg on August 31, 2009 at 08:31 AM MDT #

Thanks again for comments. Sheila: I don't think we'll agree. I'm of the view that mental health care has to move into the mainstream and the days of isolation are over. This view is reflected in contemporary mental health policy throughout the rest of the developed world. Peter: We are currently working on identifying where/how the places may be provided. I hope to be able to be clearer later next month. Patricia: We treated our partners the same way we treated ourselves, no tougher, no more generous. I think that is fair to everyone. I was asked about the so-called 'cut' at the media conference last week and made a similar point about the increase. Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on August 31, 2009 at 09:03 AM MDT #

Dr. Duckett, Respectfully I must strongly disagree with your last comment regarding mental health care. I happen to know that Homewood Health Centre in Guelph Ontario is a leader in mental health and addiction treatment, providing specialized psychiatric services to all Canadians. Stays vary from one month to longer. Unique in Canadian health care, Homewood is a highly specialized provincial and national resource. A fully accredited facility, Homewood has achieved the highest standards in quality care. Homewood has received numerous awards, including the prestigious Canada Award of Excellence - Quality Award, Healthy Workplace Award and the Order of Excellence Award. Programs and services include: Addiction treatment ? Integrated Mood and Anxiety Program ?Eating Disorders Program ? Program for Traumatic Stress Recovery ? Program for Older Adults ? Comprehensive Psychiatric Care ? Crisis, Assessment and Stabilization Program Homewood Outreach Program ? Substance Abuse and Trauma Safety Program There is no support in Alberta for people with PTSD. This facility is a gold standard, and offers services that are much needed here as well. Why do people have to go to Ontario for this? And you want to close what little we do have? There are times when being at home or in your community IS NOT ENOUGH!! I am sick and tired of Mental Health in Alberta being put on the back burner, reinforcing the stigma and prejudice that already exists for these people. It is time for people to speak up and out about this. Please please PLEASE consider that we need more, not less in this area. Have you checked into how long it takes to get a child with mental health concerns help via ACCESS MENTAL HEALTH? My 7 year old friend's daughter has been waiting for 10 months. She lost a whole school year, still waiting for our so-called "COMMUNITY BASED mental health services"! It breaks my heart. And she is not alone.

Posted by Penny on August 31, 2009 at 12:01 PM MDT #

For those wanting some per review information on community based psychiatric care, here is a comment from the British Medical Journal. We may find that we do not like the tone of this research. "Care models for discharged psychiatric patients Community based care is superior to conventional care Authors' reply Community based care is superior to conventional care The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. EDITOR Tyrer et al's conclusion that aftercare for psychiatric patients with severe mental illness by community teams has a similar outcome to that by hospitals is surprising until one appreciates the rudimentary form of community intervention that they used in the study.1 The two methods of follow up they compared seem to have many similarities, except that the community follow up was provided by a team based outside the hospital. This is not really community treatment two styles of intervention were compared that were not distinct in terms of the care and treatment given to the patients. This may be why Tyrer et al found no substantial difference in outcome between the two approaches. Tyrer himself has recently described this kind of community treatment as profligate and little short of disastrous.2"

Posted by Hugh on August 31, 2009 at 12:26 PM MDT #

One of the areas of the AHS initial survey addressed education and questioned whether current educational tracks were attuned to the type and scope of the employeee desired in the future AHS design. Are there any plans to create educational modules to offer opportunities to develop the skills of employees to make them more effective in their expanded roles? eg.dealing compassionately and safely with geriatric aggression. Also, I agree Mr. Duckett with the assessment that acute beds are designed for acute care and LTC is best suited to the ongoing life needs of geriatric and chronic care patients. I work in both acute and LTC and I am concerned about the privatization of LTC beds through Private Partnerships. The staffing, required educational levels, fair remuneration, access and commitment to Rehabilitation are not always equal to the standards set by the health regions. We have been moving to individualized person centered care, delivered in smaller settings and now see moves to a single megafacility approach in our community, a model not desired for AHS mental health delivery. As we recruit and develop available LTC and assisted living beds in AB I hope they are more accountable and aligned to the Health Regions vision and standards. Thanks for this opportunity for input

Posted by sheila free on August 31, 2009 at 12:48 PM MDT #

Hi Dr. Duckett. I'm not normally the type to cry over spilt milk but I am a little bit frustrated over some of the recent changes to nursing. It wasn't all that long ago (2 or so years) that universities in Alberta were given additional funding for more nursing seats and the CHR was aggressively recruiting internationally-signs that Alberta was acknowledging a significant nursing shortage and clearly desperate to get nurses into the province. The current stance taken by AHS seems to suggest that there are sufficient nurses in the system to adequately meet the needs of the patient provided they are working to their full capacity (ie not doing an LPN's work). How did we go from a huge nursing shortage to a surplus in such short time? I am deeply concerned that the nursing shortage has not been addressed and as these hordes of nursing students begin to graduate in the next year or so, they will all leave Alberta (with their training partly funded by Albertans), never to return.

Posted by pd on August 31, 2009 at 01:54 PM MDT #

Dr. Duckett, Recently an undergraduate nurse employee (UNE) job posting (Requisition # 113094) was limited to students from University of Calgary BNRT or BNAT programs. Previously UNE positions have included students enrolled in other programs such as Athabasca at Mount Royal College: BN (AU@MRC: BN)?provided that the students had completed all third year courses. The College and Association of Registered Nurses of Alberta and the Canadian Nursing Association recognize the AU@MRC:BN as an accredited program that qualifies the degree holders for application for licensure and entry to practice. I hope you can address the rationale behind excluding nursing students educated in accredited schools and solely accepting students being educated at the UofC. Furthermore, if limiting qualified applicant to UofC educated nurses was due to an unfortunate oversight, will the position be reposted so ALL students qualified to work as an UNE will have equal opportunity to apply and be consider for this position?

Posted by lana on August 31, 2009 at 04:03 PM MDT #

I'm hoping if you offer early retirement packages that you will look and see the people who are already getting their pension from lapp and working part time, this would seem unfair to offer them a package. What is your view on this?

Posted by bev on August 31, 2009 at 04:12 PM MDT #

Dr. Duckett: With reference to your reply to Peter (31Aug09), ?We are currently working on identifying where/how the places may be provided? (alternative to AHE). I would hope financial expediency is not the sole dictate guiding the search for these alternatives. It would imply no new specialist facilities would be built, and AHE patients would have to ?make do? with whatever accommodation can be found. My practice area is geriatric psychiatry. Many patients admitted to AHE are individuals with severely and persistently challenging behaviours emerging in the context of dementia or psychiatric illness. These are patients for whom the physical and human environment plays a crucial role in their management. Lack of appropriate environment/staffing in existing continuing care and assisting living facilities are key factors exacerbating their behaviours and frequently resulting in admissions to AHE for specialized treatment. In Victoria, Australia, the building of specialist psychogeriatric nursing homes and hostels preceded the demise of stand-alone psychiatric hospitals. It would seem our financial plight precludes similar investment in alternative specialized facilities here. In light of this reality would it not be better to delay any AHE bed closures until our financial situation enables us to ?do the right thing?.

Posted by David on September 01, 2009 at 02:05 PM MDT #

I have two points: I was wondering about the new Community based model for Mental Health. I was there in Toronto when 999 Queen Street opened it's doors and sent everyone out into the "community". Sure that was years ago, but as someone who volunteers in the inner city on a weekly basis, I am concerned about the plight of those patients, who, apparently not under the guise of being ready, but rather under the auspices of saving money, are reintegrated into the Community. If these patients cannot afford to live well, then they will be living poorly. Down in the inner city, where they may be accosted for their meds, sell their own meds for money to eat etc. How will the removed patients continue to receive care? I envision Toronto when this "Mental Health Cleansing" took place, and I know our inner city's woes, and I can't fathom this new model. Are we to believe that there will be cozy, loving, well tended homes for these patients to go to? Which is what they deserve. Or what happens when NIMBY (not in my back yard) rears it's ugly head via the public. It appears this move is budgetary only. Takes the money burden off AHS, at the expense of the patient, and puts it on the City of Edmonton. My second point: In order for us to hold our heads high and rise above the backlash of this whole merger, it may be best, in my opinion, if we stopped bashing and belittling certain job positions. We all have to work together and denigrating someone's education or lack thereof reflects so poorly on us.

Posted by Jane on September 01, 2009 at 02:29 PM MDT #

I think this blog has sparked more comments than all the others! Thanks. And particular thanks to David for mentioning the Victorian (Australia) experience. You may not know but the idea of psycho-geriatric nursing homes was mine and I organized the funding for and determined the locations of them. All I can do is repeat my earlier comments about no moves of patients till we know where they can go. We are still working on this. I hope to be able to finish this work in the next couple of weeks. Bev: anyone that is working and receiving pension benefits as a result of employment with a predecessor organization will have previously been terminated. As such, their severance would be based on the date of rehire. I'm still following up on some of the other issues. Best wishes Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on September 01, 2009 at 03:54 PM MDT #

I'm just curious, what will the criteria be for the early retirement package? Will it be available to anyone with more than 20 years of service? When will more details be known? Thank you

Posted by Lisa on September 02, 2009 at 08:45 AM MDT #

Money saving suggestion: I am an occupational therapist working in a rural area. In the community where I work I have had a recent rash of referrals to address issues related to walk in shower safety in the lodge here which was opened in the past year. In the area I worked previously there was a designated assisted living (DAL)which had the exact same shower stalls with a slightly different configuration for bars that had very similar safety issues for the clients living there. Addressing these issues involves numerous man hours for OT. I expect that similar walk in showers are in recently built lodges and DAL's across the province. There is a need to advocate when plans are being made to build facilities to ensure the what is put in place at time of build is going to be appropriate for the type of clientelle who will be living there. RECOMMENDATION:If Alberta Health is reworking legislation I think there should be a requirement for a experienced community OT to provide input re design from the point of view of safety, accerssibility and promoting client independence whenever a new facility is being built.

Posted by Judy on September 02, 2009 at 12:14 PM MDT #

I am extremely dissappointed with the closures of the parking lots for CHC downtown. I am a single mother on a limited income. Every penny is accounted for from month to month. Working downtown is not cheap. The parking is incredibly expensive. I decided to make two choices for the parking dilema. I chose to car pool with two other women to save costs and to be more environmentally friendly in doing so. Now you have taken those choices away from me. I now have to pay more money for parking every month, which I can't afford and I am being forced not to car pool anymore. Is this your way of having more people quit at AHS inorder to save money?

Posted by Jennifer Schatz on September 02, 2009 at 03:53 PM MDT #

Good morning Dr. Duckett, I would like to express my extreme disappointment with the fact that AHS is taking away so many incentives from its employees. Parking has been mentioned in the previous post, as well as merit increase for out of scope employees, and education milestones - things that have been given as a "perk", insentive when we got hired. It seems like those don't mean anything to the organization anymore...so sad to realize that all the efforts have been wasted. News just keep getting better every day. So, I think I will ask the question of many: What's the incentive of continuing being loyal to the organization??? I'm so thankful I'm starting my mat.leave in couple of weeks, because this is far from being the pleasent work environment to be in...

Posted by Irina on September 03, 2009 at 10:18 AM MDT #

Hi again Dr. Duckett. Further to my question about what to do with the surplus of nurses, I am wondering what kind of a message AHS is sending to its staff who are attempting to manage this 3% when AHS execs continue to receive handsome severance packages. Everyone is trying as hard as they can to meet the new budget requirements at the ground level but somehow it appears that the executive level is exempt.

Posted by pd on September 03, 2009 at 11:23 AM MDT #

I have some concerns regarding your recent blog entry. I work at Alberta Hospital Edmonton (AHE), and I not only love my job, but I love caring for the clients. In your blog you mention: "We are currently consulting with staff at Alberta Hospital Edmonton on what appropriate services might look like". All of the staff that I have consulted with at AHE, over-whelmingly feel that the best care for our clients is in an in-patient setting. AHE has been through the whole deinstitutionalization process many times in the past. I strongly believe that only AHE can provide the level of care and the unique treatment that our clients require, it would be a disservice to Albertans to close beds at AHE. Statistics have shown that Alberta's average of in-patient beds are far below that of the national average - 1/4 to be exact; it makes no sense to close beds. Best practice has shown that you need a mix of in-patient and community based treatment - Alberta falls short in both areas due to lack of appropriate resources. Your call to increase community-based care settings/treatments for our population is laudable - but at the same time it needs to be accompanied with an increase in much needed acute in-patient beds to treat addiction and mental health. Many of my colleagues feel offended and belittled by your statement that if AHE "...were to continue in its current form - a care model out of touch with contemporary best practice - there would be a need for a massive redevelopment." AHE does provide best practice care (I work with many professionals whom do practice best practice) for our clients. Canceling capital plans due to financial concerns is one thing, but dismissing the work and efforts of staff by calling them out of touch is quite another. For a CEO to do so publicly can be very disheartening. As I mentioned previously, you need a good mixture of in-patient vs out-patient resources and we are lacking sufficient numbers of both. AHE is known on national and international levels as being a leader in research and successful treatment programs for those individuals with psychiatric disorders. I would like to see AHE continue to strive to live up to this title and provide leadership and quality mental health care for all Albertans.

Posted by Jamie on September 03, 2009 at 11:29 AM MDT #

While we?re not familiar with AHE, as health promotion practitioners, we would like to make some suggestions. These type of solutions need to include more than just the health sector - other sectors need to be consulted, i.e. housing, education, employment & transportation, for both short-term & long-term solutions. There will be no ?one? solution. Vulnerable populations that are impacted by such changes should also be included in describing the problem, developing solutions, and evaluating them. This asking for input will need to be done appropriately and sensitively, and we need to be prepared for their views to potentially be different than our own. In this situation and broadly, we should also be focussing on primary prevention, not just treatment. We need to be looking upstream to keep people from falling into the river. We shouldn?t spend all our resources rescuing them when research strongly supports the importance and effectiveness of prevention. It?s promising to see that the AHS Strategic Plan?s first Area of Focus is Improving Population Health - which needs to be applied. This means giving equal weight to health promotion and prevention.

Posted by Jill Sharpe and Stephanie Patterson on September 03, 2009 at 03:06 PM MDT #

Good Morning, One cost saving area I have identified as a pharmacist is in the electronic libraries that are maintained across the province. It seems that there is little standardization between the resources available in the different areas. If a central provincial electronic library, accessable to all health care professionals and physicians it could improve patient care across the province and reduce costs in maintaining seperate licences for each of the former health regions.

Posted by Adam on September 04, 2009 at 11:07 AM MDT #

Interesting that the blog enrty I posted last week has been deleted even though it simply asked you a question. So I will once again ask the question that is on my mind and that of many of my collegues and that is "Can you define for me my exact duties as a Registered Nurse?" There has been much talk about nurses preforming "non-nursing duites" therefore detracting them from having the ability to pratice at their full scope. However, I am unclear as to what you think my duties as an RN are and how better my time can be spent if not caring for all the needs of my patient? Shall I tell them that they can wait for their bed bath because I do not have time for it since my nurse to patient ratio has gone up, or that they can wait for the 1 NA to finish with the rest of the 27 other patients they are supposed to wash. Or shall I do what I learned in Nursing School (therefore in my opinion, a nursing duty) and give them a bed bath all the while completing an integral part of my assessment in doing so but greatly decreasing my ability to care for all 5-6 of my patients in the comprehensive way Albertans have come to expect from their nurses? A clear Definition of what you feel is a "nursing Duty" would be appreciated!

Posted by lise on September 04, 2009 at 02:10 PM MDT #

I would just like to say that the Connect newsletter that are mailed out every month is a waste of money. We could get by with 2 coming to our office instead of 175 because we can read it on line. Then that money could go to more important things in the health system.

Posted by Danielle on September 04, 2009 at 04:08 PM MDT #

Thanks all for your comments. Lisa: We've released the management and out-of-scope offer now so your question might be answered there. Basically there are two sides to the offer. You as an employee have to decide you want one - it IS voluntary after all. You need to let us know you're interested, we calculate what the offer would be worth to you, you then decide whether you really are interested. Then it becomes our (management's) side. What we ahve said is that we will only accept an early retirement if that job, or a similar one, can be abolished i.e. by your taking early retirement we will avert a lay-off. There is no age limit or length of employment requirement in any of this. Judy: I've passed your suggestion on. Jennifer: I know the parking lot closure will make it difficult for you (and others). However, I have said publicly that as far as possible any budget reductions will not impact on patient care or other services. Hence the cut in parking costs. Irina: You make a somewhat similar point to Jennifer. In addition what we were doing is harmonizing entitlements accross the organization. There were other colleagues in Alberta Health Services, previously employed by a different region, who were doing exactly the same sort of job as you who, for example, didn't have automatic incraeses and so on. When we transitioned to similar conditions that inevitably created a disjunction, the affects of which we tried to minimize by doing it at the same time as the annual pay adjustment. pd: I take the point about the generosity of the package. That was negotiated before I got here. We are not so generous now (e.g. one year max now). Jamie: There may be a problem of language here. When I use the term 'community setting', I am not talking about throwing people out on the streets, despite the commentary in the media. So, a community setting for an ALC patient at Albert Hospital Edmonton (AHE) may be a designated assisted living facility, located somehwre in Edmonton (or surrounds). The contrast I am making is partly scale, partly 'institutional fee', partly the isolated location of the current facility. This may or may not be the same as an 'instutional' setting as you use the term. My problem with AHE is not the staff or even the existing programs, but that it could be so much better if undertaken in community settings. Jill and Stephanie: I agree with your comments and I trust we are doing that. Adam: We are standardizing the libraries. This will be most noticeable for people who used to be employed by smaller regions who will get access to the same material as their Calgary and Edmonton colleagues. Lise: I definititely answered something like your post but I don't have a search engine so i can't check. Anyway, what I've talked about is having all staff, RNs, LPNs, Aides, doctors, pharmacists, working to their full scope of practice. Sure you know how to bath a patient, but so too does the Aide. If we had enough Aides, would you prefer to use your time bathing the patient or teaching the patient what to do so they don't get readmitted? Danielle: I think we have done a survey on what people think of Connect but I will check. Thanks again every one for all the comments and have a nice long weekend. Stephen

Posted by Stephen Duckett on September 05, 2009 at 04:33 PM MDT #

Just a few suggestions and questions. In regards to parking would taking public transit be a greener and less expensive alternative? My concern with the changes at AHE is that are the clients that will be placed else where in the community be spending more time in our emergency rooms and being admitted into acute care beds because they have less support in the community and because this was too much of a change for them? Irina, I definitley did not become a nurse for the "perks", your workplace is only as positive as you make it. Change is difficult but sometimes if you challenge your coworkers feelings can turn around for the better. Lise, I haven't worked on a floor yet that has had enough aids to bath all of the patients who need a bath but a point to keep in mind is that patients don't die if they aren't completely clean. As a nurse I know that it's nice to clean our patients up but remember that it is not our main goal. Our main goal should be treatment of the current problems. Once the patients are feeling better they can usually help more with their own bathing. Take it all in stride.

Posted by Jodi Breitkreuz on September 07, 2009 at 03:41 AM MDT #

Jodi, Thank you for your comment. I definately did not become an accountant for the "perks" myself, otherwise I'd be working somewhere in an oil industry... I do agree that taking a bus is a greener alternative, but unfortunately doesn't always work. People comute from Ft. Sask, Morinville and other areas to come downtown, and spending 1.5 hours on the bus versus spending that time with your child makes a big difference! With regards to the other benefits that I listed that have been taken away, I am disappointed with the fact that they've been taken away, but even more so, I'm disappointed how they've been taken away - no formal announcement, no communication at all... I mean, it seems like everything we learn, we learn from newspapers. And how come we don't have money for the parking, but do have money to pay generous severance packages...I mean in the end it's mine and yours tax dollars!

Posted by Irina on September 08, 2009 at 09:21 AM MDT #

Mr. Duckett - regarding your response to the parking issues at CHC. I must say that your response comes across as rather heartless and for that I am disappointed. However, after speaking with the Regional Parking Manager, he assured me that all persons who have been redirected to parking at the EGH are "Guaranteed" a spot to park. Although he refused to assure me this guarantee via email or any other hard copy I am counting on his guarantee to be followed through prior to Oct 1/09. In the meantime - I have to wonder how many AHS employees have stopped to realize that patient care starts with the patient and ends with patient. BUT there are alot of people in the middle of the patient care line involved in assuring that a patient is cared for to the best of our capabilities. That includes, doctors, nurses, housekeepers, maintenance people, teachers, family, financial clerks, parking managers, volunteers etc. All employees are responsible for the value of patient care within this org. Staff is going to decrease, cut backs are taking place and moral is going down in ALL depts of AHS. Instead of AHS buying cake and flowers for staff in order to boost their moral, how about looking at more economic ways of boosting moral and keeping cutbacks where they really belong?

Posted by Jennifer Schatz on September 08, 2009 at 01:29 PM MDT #

Offering early retirement to experienced Registered Nurses is a big mistake. There is a REAL nursing shortage, that DOES exist even if the AHS and the Provincial Government claims that it doesn't. New Graduate Nurses will be leaving the region to look for work elsewhere and the future short fall of Registered Nurses will be a loss that we will have to deal with for years to come. The Registered Nurses have a strong union (UNA) that will no doubt make our position very clear early next year when negotiations for a new collective agreement begin.

Posted by Kristine Cowart RN on September 08, 2009 at 11:08 PM MDT #

Mr. Duckett, if staff take you up on the offer to retire early and the H1N1 pandemic overwhelms the hospitals as predicted, you've limited the resources needed to care for the patients. Especially since they will more then likely require some form of Critical Care. It was mentioned that part of the AHS pandemic plan was to have retired, non-working staff return to work at that time. Why would I accept a severence package and then agree to come back to work? The money that you might save will be meaningless because the cost of pandemic care will skyrocket. Wouldn't it be prudent to wait until the pandemic crisis ceases to be an issue to intitiate early retirement?

Posted by Jasmin Legue on September 09, 2009 at 08:56 AM MDT #

Before You Post Your Comment:

• Although this is a staff blog it can be read by visitors from outside of the organization. The blog is currently maintained on a publicly accessible website. Please keep that in mind when posting your comments.

• Identify yourself honestly by proving your name and email address (email address will not be shared). Your name will appear next to your posting so, given there is external exposure, you may elect to use your given name or initials only.

• Entries that are too long will not be posted. Entries must not exceed 2000 characters.

• Comments are open for the first 20 days of the posting and will not be accepted after that.

• For additional information read the AHS Blog Policy.
Post a Comment:
Comments are closed for this entry.
 
CEO/President's Blog


Blog from Dr. Stephen Duckett for all Alberta Health Services' staff.




> AHS Blog Policy

> Blog Stats

> Remember to submit your comments within 20 days of the posting.

« September 2010
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
   
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
  
       
Today


 
© Dave.Pirie